The Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH) randomized about 1100 patients with symptomatic heart failure, LVEF <35% on optimal medical therapy but without coronary artery disease to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy without finding any lowering of all cause death with the device. A nonpacing ICD prevents sudden death from arrhythmia, particularly in patients with coronary disease heart failure. The evidence for efficacy of an ICD in nonischemic heart failure is not very robust. DANISH enrolled patients of systolic nonischemic heart failure and an elevated N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP); half received an ICD while the other half were assigned to contemporary heart failure therapy.More than 90% of patients in both groups received beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and 60% of patients in both groups took mineralocorticoid inhibitors. Almost 58% of patients had a CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy) pacemaker in them. In fact CRT were implanted in 93% of patients who had left bundle branch block and QRS >150 ms. The median follow up was 67 months.
Continue reading “ICDs MAY NOT WORK FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION IN NON-ISCHEMIC HEART FAILURE”






























